<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Science Learnification</title>
	<atom:link href="http://learnification.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://learnification.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Teaching and learning in the sciences with a focus on physics education research (PER) from the trenches</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 18:54:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Physics Problem and Standards-Based Grading by SBG and Multiple Representations in Kinematics &#124; Fock Physics</title>
		<link>http://learnification.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/the-physics-problem-and-standards-based-grading/#comment-614</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SBG and Multiple Representations in Kinematics &#124; Fock Physics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 18:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnification.wordpress.com/?p=154#comment-614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] The Physics Problem and Standards-Based Grading—Although it&#8217;s not what I&#8217;m looking for, it does consider the question, &#8220;How does one assess solving problems?&#8221; [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The Physics Problem and Standards-Based Grading—Although it&#8217;s not what I&#8217;m looking for, it does consider the question, &#8220;How does one assess solving problems?&#8221; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Student collision mini-projects from my fall comp-phys course by bretbenesh</title>
		<link>http://learnification.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/student-collision-mini-projects-from-my-fall-comp-phys-course/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bretbenesh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 13:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnification.wordpress.com/?p=856#comment-606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is pretty good advice, Joss.  Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is pretty good advice, Joss.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Student collision mini-projects from my fall comp-phys course by Joss Ives</title>
		<link>http://learnification.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/student-collision-mini-projects-from-my-fall-comp-phys-course/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joss Ives]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 04:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnification.wordpress.com/?p=856#comment-605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for getting me to consider this a bit more Bret. When reflecting on these two tasks, I realize that they were synthesis activities (for 2-3 weeks worth of topics) that involved only a minimum of new content as compared to other weeks. So my advice would be to find a task that could be used to synthesize a few weeks of content. It would probably be easier to start with a fairly specific task and then try to generalize it to the point where you could think of 3 or 4 examples of mini-projects that would fit the generalized one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for getting me to consider this a bit more Bret. When reflecting on these two tasks, I realize that they were synthesis activities (for 2-3 weeks worth of topics) that involved only a minimum of new content as compared to other weeks. So my advice would be to find a task that could be used to synthesize a few weeks of content. It would probably be easier to start with a fairly specific task and then try to generalize it to the point where you could think of 3 or 4 examples of mini-projects that would fit the generalized one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Student collision mini-projects from my fall comp-phys course by Bret Benesh</title>
		<link>http://learnification.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/student-collision-mini-projects-from-my-fall-comp-phys-course/#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bret Benesh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnification.wordpress.com/?p=856#comment-604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you have any advice on how to create projects that find the &quot;sweet spot&quot; of &quot;focused enough, but allows for a lot of creativity?&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have any advice on how to create projects that find the &#8220;sweet spot&#8221; of &#8220;focused enough, but allows for a lot of creativity?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Student collision mini-projects from my fall comp-phys course by Joss Ives</title>
		<link>http://learnification.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/student-collision-mini-projects-from-my-fall-comp-phys-course/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joss Ives]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnification.wordpress.com/?p=856#comment-603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes and no. The prompts were barely more detailed than what I described in this post and then I provided some examples to orient them a bit. One more advantage that I forgot to mention was that the prompts seemed to narrow the scope down to just the right size so that the students wasted very little time cycling endlessly though potential topics (which I often see with larger projects) and instead got down to work quickly. But the creative phase space was large enough that there was still an amazing diversity of mini-projects. 

Very few of the comp-phys mini projects had much in the way of similarity to my examples so the prompt and examples for that case seemed like they turned out just right. The digital mini-projects were a bit more restricted in scope due to the limited number of different types of sensors that were available, but there was an amazing variety in the paths that they took so I think that worked out really well too. Lucky first try for me I suspect.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes and no. The prompts were barely more detailed than what I described in this post and then I provided some examples to orient them a bit. One more advantage that I forgot to mention was that the prompts seemed to narrow the scope down to just the right size so that the students wasted very little time cycling endlessly though potential topics (which I often see with larger projects) and instead got down to work quickly. But the creative phase space was large enough that there was still an amazing diversity of mini-projects. </p>
<p>Very few of the comp-phys mini projects had much in the way of similarity to my examples so the prompt and examples for that case seemed like they turned out just right. The digital mini-projects were a bit more restricted in scope due to the limited number of different types of sensors that were available, but there was an amazing variety in the paths that they took so I think that worked out really well too. Lucky first try for me I suspect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Student collision mini-projects from my fall comp-phys course by Joss Ives</title>
		<link>http://learnification.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/student-collision-mini-projects-from-my-fall-comp-phys-course/#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joss Ives]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnification.wordpress.com/?p=856#comment-602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One thing that I noticed is that the students found these mini-projects to be exhausting. They seemed to be the exact right size that the students were intensely focused on them for a relatively short amount of time. Due to this intensity, it would take some careful planning and a lot of student feedback to turn a course into a sequence of mini-projects, but I suspect there is a sweet spot between mini-projects of this scope and your standards where this might be possible.

I was amazed at the creativity that I saw and the quality of the work (both courses). It was certainly much higher than I would have anticipated when I first put the tasks together.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that I noticed is that the students found these mini-projects to be exhausting. They seemed to be the exact right size that the students were intensely focused on them for a relatively short amount of time. Due to this intensity, it would take some careful planning and a lot of student feedback to turn a course into a sequence of mini-projects, but I suspect there is a sweet spot between mini-projects of this scope and your standards where this might be possible.</p>
<p>I was amazed at the creativity that I saw and the quality of the work (both courses). It was certainly much higher than I would have anticipated when I first put the tasks together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Student collision mini-projects from my fall comp-phys course by bretbenesh</title>
		<link>http://learnification.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/student-collision-mini-projects-from-my-fall-comp-phys-course/#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bretbenesh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnification.wordpress.com/?p=856#comment-601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These really are great projects.  

&quot;make a collision simulation using Mathematica or Python where there has to be at least 3 different parameters&quot;

&quot;take the input from an analog sensor, apply some electronic decision-making to this input and provide some digital output related to the input.&quot;

Were these basically the entire prompts for the projects?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These really are great projects.  </p>
<p>&#8220;make a collision simulation using Mathematica or Python where there has to be at least 3 different parameters&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;take the input from an analog sensor, apply some electronic decision-making to this input and provide some digital output related to the input.&#8221;</p>
<p>Were these basically the entire prompts for the projects?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Student collision mini-projects from my fall comp-phys course by Andy "SuperFly" Rundquist</title>
		<link>http://learnification.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/student-collision-mini-projects-from-my-fall-comp-phys-course/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy "SuperFly" Rundquist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 23:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnification.wordpress.com/?p=856#comment-600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These are great projects! It&#039;s so cool how they made the goal and painted the lines. I would imagine they really learned a lot working on these. 

I would agree that these projects are larger than a typical standard of mine, and so now you&#039;ve got me thinking of ways I could use something like this. I would guess you saw more creativity, on average, than what I see because of the length.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are great projects! It&#8217;s so cool how they made the goal and painted the lines. I would imagine they really learned a lot working on these. </p>
<p>I would agree that these projects are larger than a typical standard of mine, and so now you&#8217;ve got me thinking of ways I could use something like this. I would guess you saw more creativity, on average, than what I see because of the length.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Two-Stage Group Quizzes Part 1: What, How and Why by Group Quiz Results! &#8212; Wisdom Begins with Wonder</title>
		<link>http://learnification.wordpress.com/2011/03/23/two-stage-group-quizzes-part-1-what-how-and-why/#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Group Quiz Results! &#8212; Wisdom Begins with Wonder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://learnification.wordpress.com/?p=208#comment-597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] read a blog post about 2-stage quizzes and wanted to work them in in my standards-based grading [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read a blog post about 2-stage quizzes and wanted to work them in in my standards-based grading [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Two-Stage Group Quizzes Part 1: What, How and Why by &#8212; Wisdom Begins with Wonder</title>
		<link>http://learnification.wordpress.com/2011/03/23/two-stage-group-quizzes-part-1-what-how-and-why/#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#8212; Wisdom Begins with Wonder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://learnification.wordpress.com/?p=208#comment-596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] read a blog post about 2-stage quizzes and wanted to work them in in my standards-based grading [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read a blog post about 2-stage quizzes and wanted to work them in in my standards-based grading [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
